Talking 400m with Peter Fortune and Nik Hagicostas
6 Key Messages I Took From the Masters
Coaching the 400m with Peter Fortune and Nik Hagicostas. A practical reflection for athletics coaches on speed, endurance, race modelling, youth development, recovery and patience.
The 400m is a fascinating event because it never quite lets coaches sit comfortably in one camp. It is not simply a sprint, and it is not simply an endurance event. It sits in that awkward, brilliant space between pure speed and controlled endurance.
That was one of the real strengths of this discussion with Peter Fortune and Nik Hagicostas. They did not present one neat, polished, one size fits all answer to coaching the 400m. Instead, they shared years of coaching experience, athlete examples, honest reflections and a few reminders that are easy to agree with in theory, but much harder to apply on the track.
Tap each message to explore
One of the strongest parts of the discussion was the reminder that young athletes do not need to be treated like miniature senior 400m runners.
Peter put it simply when discussing 14 to 18 year olds: “Hopefully, they do less work.” He spoke about developing the whole athlete, not just the event performer, and warned against treating a 14 year old as though they are ready to train like Michael Johnson.
“It affects their speed, and it is very demanding on the system, and it breaks them mentally as well if they do too much.”
Nik also noted that some young athletes he sees are doing three times as much as his senior athletes. That should make any coach pause.
- Ask whether the session is building the athlete or just proving they can suffer.
- Protect speed, rhythm, confidence and enjoyment in younger athletes.
- Use hard 400m specific work carefully, not as the default badge of toughness.
There was a lovely coaching line from Nik that many coaches will recognise.
“We can become romantic with the stopwatch. The stopwatch doesn’t tell you everything.”
Nik described using 30m efforts as a regular benchmark. If an athlete’s 30m times are well off after a previous harder session, it may be a sign that the coach has overcooked them and needs to modify the session.
Peter shared a similar idea through his use of 60m runs. He timed from first foot down because he wanted a consistent measure of actual running time, not a pretend 60m time trial.
- Use timing as a guide, not a dictator.
- Watch rhythm, posture, ground contact and relaxation as well as the time.
- If the athlete is not ready, adjust the session before the session adjusts them.
Peter was very clear on this point.
“There’s not much point in a slow 400 metre runner.”
He linked this to speed reserve, explaining that if an athlete wants to run 50 seconds, they need to be able to run 25 seconds for 200m. If they cannot, then no amount of courage, conditioning or clever race modelling will magically solve the problem.
Nik agreed and used Aidan Murphy as an example. If Aidan is to move towards 44 seconds or better, then being able to run through 200m in around 20.8 becomes much easier if his open 200m ability is closer to 20.1.
- Do not let 400m training become only about surviving the last 100m.
- Keep developing maximum speed and 200m ability.
- Use speed reserve to help athletes run fast while staying relaxed.
The Aidan Murphy example was one of the most useful practical sections of the conversation.
Nik explained that they had a two year plan. The first phase was about focusing on the 200m and maximising max velocity while gradually introducing the 400m.
“It’s taken a long time to do that.”
The progression was not random. Nik worked out the velocities Aidan needed, found that he could initially maintain them for around 150m, then gradually added 25m to repetitions across winter while maintaining quality and rhythm.
The reason was just as important as the method. Aidan had previously struggled to get through a year without injury, so the goal was not simply to make him a 400m runner quickly. It was to build resilience.
- Add distance only when the athlete can keep quality and rhythm.
- Limit races when the athlete is still developing event readiness.
- See patience as a performance strategy, not a lack of ambition.
One of the clearest coaching statements in the discussion came from Nik.
“If you don’t use the metrics you’re collecting to model your race plan, you’re kidding yourself.”
Nik described using training information like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, then finding the best fit for the athlete’s race model. For his athletes, he often breaks the 400m into 50m segments, using target markers to provide feedback and help athletes understand the event in smaller, more manageable parts.
Peter’s reflections on Catherine Freeman added another layer. He said that for Sydney he devised a race plan he thought would win the race, not necessarily run the fastest time.
- Build race models from what the athlete can actually do in training.
- Use smaller sections, such as 50m markers, to teach rhythm and awareness.
- Remember that a championship race plan is often about winning, not just chasing the fastest possible time.
Nik’s background in therapy and coaching gave this section real weight. His point was not that medical or therapy input is unimportant. Quite the opposite. But he made it clear that passing a clinical test does not automatically mean the athlete is ready to sprint at full speed.
“What you see in the rooms is not what you see on the track.”
Peter added a related point about the importance of the team around the athlete. Not every coach can be the therapist, strength coach, biomechanist and psychologist. Most coaches cannot be all of those, so part of the job is developing the right team.
- Do not confuse pain free with ready for max velocity sprinting.
- Use gradual, functional progressions on the track.
- Communicate clearly with therapists and support staff about what the event actually demands.
Final thought
What I enjoyed most about this conversation was that Peter and Nik did not speak like coaches trying to win an argument. They spoke like coaches who have spent a lifetime learning from athletes.
There were different philosophies in the discussion. Short to long. Long to short. More speed emphasis. More event demand emphasis. But underneath those differences, the common message was clear.
Know the athlete. Build patiently. Protect speed. Use the information in front of you. Do not rush young athletes. And remember that the best 400m coaching is rarely about finding one magic session. It is about building the athlete, one sensible decision at a time.
